In an interview to the UK student Newspaper, President Todd emphasized that he earned a 96 on his performance evaluation. It is not clear who evaluated him. Most of the faculty never got a chance to evaluate his performance. Even when faculty are asked to turn in adminstrator evaluations, faculty are not provided the results. Recent evaluations of the Provost and several Deans are a case in point. The performance evaluation data has never been made public and requests for such data have been denied. Makes one wonder why they do not disclose this information.
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
1 comment:
I can certainly tell you one faculty member who didn't get the opportuntity to evaluate Todd; and if I had had the opportunity, along with a lot of other faculty and staff, there would have been a decimal point between the 9 and the 6. 96%??? in your dreams. Must have been evaluated by other administrators who have been bought and paid for by Todd. The final evaluation was by the board of trustees...and we know we can't trust their judgment. They appear to answer to Todd, rather than the other way around as it is supposed to be. When will we get some trustees with some backbone?????
Post a Comment